Wednesday, February 24, 2010

Back in Black

We talked in class about the national budget deficit and how much of a threat it is. Ways of eliminating debt as discussed are paying off the debt, debasing it through inflation, or defaulting on the debt and simply not paying it. Looking at the graph of factors that have contributed (slide 5 of the power point from Tuesday, February 16th) we can see that the Bush era tax cuts are the greatest contributors to the national deficit. This makes me wonder: why have the taxes not been reinstated? Is it because getting taxes past is too difficult? Is it because if Obama pushes for higher taxes for the wealthy he'll have to put up with even more crap about being a socialist? (I just saw another article today where Obama is defending himself against the accusation. He assures them that he really does support a competitive economy and want to create jobs. This is really sort of funny though since he was a community organizer so why anyone would seriously doubt his commitment to the middle class is beyond me. I also love the irony of citizens who value public education and public police force and social security attacking an ideology they actually support. Anyway...)
Returning to debt and taxes, I don't think we're ready to accept defaulting as the option yet; our American pride is still too strong for that. And I think that the quantity of debt we are currently buried under is too much to debase. So the question is: how do we go about paying it back?
Even if it's not an immediate concern, if we don't start being more careful about our fiscal policy we could follow in Greece's footsteps. In the words of the great Lao Tzu, "If you do not change directions, you may end up where you are heading."
Call me a liberal, but I do see tax increases as the only realistic way out of the deficit. Re-raise the taxes on the wealthiest 1% of Americans who got a break from Bush that they can live without. Raise taxes on commodities with indirect costs like cigarettes and gasoline and carbon so that those products are simultaneously discouraged and revenue is created. Some of the revenue could be invested in alternative energy technology so that it is more affordable. But it seems to me that the bottom line is that we are a society of intense consumers: we believe in the principle of economic growth and dismiss the fact that all growth has a limit. Why not learn to start making do with a stable economy, have less loose income, get the government out of debt (and debt reduces national saving and long term growth so it does need to be dealt with).
Alright, those are my thoughts on American consumerism, socialism, debt, and Lao Tzu. What are other ideas about getting us out of debt?

7 comments:

  1. Tax increases may help lower the national debt, but they would make a lot of people who are already struggling to make ends meet upset with the government. Doing so could cause people to lose faith in the current administration, which means raising taxes might cost people elections. Also, while they did contribute to the debt, I don't think we can place all of the blame on tax cuts during the Bush administration. There were plenty of other factors contributing to the national debt, like the housing market bust.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Nobody has suggested tax increases for the average American. While raising taxes on the top earners might encourage them to pass the burden on too those below, this country functioned and prospered at tax rates enormously higher than they are today. I would love to post that cartoon on the subject again, but Blogger is apparently horribly limited. The Bush tax cuts that are set to soon expire have been extended for everyone below $250k, and the Democrats are being wishy-washy about letting the rest expire.

    Also, regardless of anti-Socialist mania on the Right, Obama either does not care about the middle class or is just profoundly incompetent because his health care bill favors the industry over the average American, because his criticism of the financial industry has been all bark and no bite, and because he has given significantly harmful concessions to Republicans in the name of "bipartisanship" while getting nothing out of it. It's probably a mixture of the two.

    ReplyDelete
  3. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I don't think that trying to eliminate the budget deficit now, while we are just pulling out of a terrible recession(hopefully) is the best idea, as extra taxes or cuts in government spending could setback economic recovery. Ideally, we should have run a budget surplus during the boom years, as this would have left government able stimulate the economy without running up such a large deficit. However, thanks largely to the policies of a certain former president and his party, this wasn't the case. With this in mind, I feel that it will be best to bear with our enormous debt for now, then, once the recession is well behind us, take steps to eliminate it.

    ReplyDelete
  5. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  6. In class we learned that a national deficit is a result of when government spending exceeds income revenue. There is a debate between Americans in whether or not former president Bush was correct in implementing the stimulus and if Obama should go about the implementation of the health care reform. It is split between people who say that the government should continue increasing government spending and those who say that government should cut back on government spending and raise taxes. I'm no expert but I think there is long term and short term risks either way you go. (A,T)

    ReplyDelete
  7. I defintiely agree that we are a soceity of intense consumerism. While I don't really that much about the whole tax ordeal, however, at this point I'm going to trust the Obama Administration. I figure that at this point these isn't much else to do, but be supportive and patient. This recession is not just going to go away it'll take time.

    ReplyDelete