Wednesday, March 10, 2010

A Futures Site to Bet Real Money on Movies

Think that this spring’s “Robin Hood” movie will be a blockbuster at the box office? Next week you will be able to put your money on it.
Cantor Futures Exchange, a subsidiary of Cantor Fitzgerald, expects to open an online futures market next month that will allow studios, institutional and average moviegoers to place bets on the box-office revenue of Hollywood’s biggest releases. Late last week, the company learned from regulators that customers could start funding their accounts on March 15.
“I’ve worked in the futures industry for a long time,” said Richard Jaycobs, the president of Cantor Exchange, a subsidiary of Cantor Fitzgerald, who has worked with derivative markets and the cotton exchange. “And none of the products has the overall appeal that this does. This just has a tremendous potential audience.”
Betting on the success of Hollywood releases has long been a parlor game for moviegoers. In 2001, Cantor Fitzgerald bought the Web site HSX.com (for “Hollywood Stock Exchange”), where users can place bets with play money on a film’s box-office success; smart traders win little more than satisfaction. Mr. Jaycobs said that he hopes to lure a sizable portion of that site’s 200,000 active users to the real futures exchange.
But buyers beware: If “Avatar” is any indication, the public isn’t always so wise about Hollywood fortunes. Most users of HSX.com predicted a flop, and if those users had placed real money on the Cantor exchange, they would have taken a serious hit.
In the real market, contracts on the Cantor exchange will trade at $1 for every $1 million a movie is expected to bring in — a figure determined by traders — at the domestic box office during its first few weeks in theaters. So if “Robin Hood” is expected to bring in $100 million in its opening weeks, a single contract could be bought for $100 by a trader who thinks Russell Crowe’s role in the movie will drive sales far above expectations. If that trader guesses right, and the movie sells $150 million in tickets, the trader makes $50.
Mr. Jaycobs said the metric used — domestic box-office receipts — “is as simple as it can possibly be.” He hopes the business will attract also professional and institutional investors. If a movie distributor, for example, screens a movie it has backed and thinks sales will beat expectations, the company can take an even bigger financial stake in the movie by buying contracts for it. The possible mix of investors — Hollywood insiders and moviegoers at large — creates an interesting laboratory, said P. Clark Hallren, a managing partner at Clear Scope Partners, a financial adviser to entertainment businesses who advises Veriana Networks, a company that is planning its own futures trading operation.
“Who knows more about the movie, the studio who made the movie or the public, who says I’m going to go see it or not see it?” he said.
Cantor expects to open the exchange shortly after April 20, when it hopes to get final regulatory approval from the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, the government agency that oversees futures markets. The box-office receipts will be based on figures provided by Rentrak, a company that can provide almost real-time sales data.
As in other futures markets, investors will also sell — or “short” — contracts. If a distributor thinks a movie it is backing will struggle at the box office, the company can sell contracts in the futures market. If the distributor shorts a $100 contract and the movie grosses $50 million, the distributor will make $50, thereby limiting the company’s total losses from a film.
Conflict of interest issues are handled by limiting the amount a company can hedge through the exchange, so that a distributor could never make more money by betting against a film through futures than by having that film succeed in theaters.
“The nature of the futures business is that many of the traders are in the business they’re investing in,” said R. David Gary, a spokesman for the trading commission. If an investor in agriculture sees that bad weather is going to lower the yield, he said, it is possible to hedge that investment by shorting a crop in the futures market.
Veriana Networks, a privately owned media and technology company, plans to operate a competing trading exchange, called Trend Exchange, in Chicago after receiving regulatory approval, which the company expects later this month. Trend Exchange, however, will work only with professional and institutional investors and build the market slowly, said Rob Swagger, Veriana’s chief executive, describing his business as the “tortoise” in the race.
Mr. Swagger said that demand and recent developments, including the advent of electronic trading and audited box-office figures, had provided the opportunity to create the new market.
Hollywood investors have long hedged their risks, buying insurance against bad weather during outdoor filming, for example. But reducing the risk of poor box-office results has been much tougher, said Alice P. Neuhauser, an adviser to Veriana who manages entertainment assets for Kushner-Locke, a film and television distributor in Beverly Hills, Calif.
These new markets, she said, present Hollywood investors with “an opportunity to acquire a contract to minimize the downside risk.” Or, she said, “you can double-down on an investment that you think is going to do well.”
The new markets also present an opportunity for people and companies to put their money into a movie project that they otherwise had no opportunity to invest in, she said.
I really like this article because it amazes me how people can apply everything into making a profit out of it. Its insane how this movie website plans to make a profit, i am looking forward into seeing how the companies work out. What is your thought on this article?

6 comments:

  1. I could see this business doing well considering how many people there are that go to the movies and how interested people are to see movies break the sales record like Avitar has recently. There are certainly a lot of people in the movie going market and it's likely that some of them will be will to place bets on sales. Even with sales that are often unpredictable the chance to make a substantial gain from an investment is always there.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I also feel that this business could boom. You got movies, and you got gambling, what more could one need? When I first read it I felt it was a bit silly, but then I thought about it and realized, this could really work. There are a ton of movie maniacs out there who feel one movie is better than another, now they can put their money where their mouth is.

    ReplyDelete
  3. This new system does seem like a game. I think it will be fun for people with a lot of money to just play around with their bank accounts. However, I think the majority of the U.S. population can not participate in this one. I mean, it's kind of aggravating to sit and watch people make bets on the entertainment industry and peoples' perceptions of movies. It's our personal opinion of a movie they are making money of of. It seems unfair, but maybe just strange. T

    ReplyDelete
  4. This sounds like a lot of fun, but also potentially dangerous. Online gambling opens up whole new realms of possible users and a lot more opportunity for massive debt. What makes this site especially threatening is its mass appeal: not everyone follows horse races, knows how to play black jack, or trades in the stock market, but almost everyone watches movies. And who doesn't love to be a critic? The emotional and monetary rewards for proving your assumption about a movie's success could serve as effective bait to bring in long-term gamblers. While this does sound like a lot of fun and like a lucrative business idea, I personally would stay away. It just seems a little too enticing to get in to.

    A

    ReplyDelete
  5. To be quite honest, I think this could be fairly successful. I am also surprised that this is just originating into existence. People love to gamble, and even if money is tight, movies are a bit more predictable than betting on sports for example. The idea has a lot of promise and will hopefully, in some way, benefit our economy.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I think this website might work pretty well. But there should be some kind of rules or regulation, I mean this is gambling. Out of respect for privacy, people can go on there without giving their actual information. It might promote gambling at a young age. What if a 14 years old is gambling away his money on that site than spending time doing his actual school work?
    Government might have to come up with a policy or something for this, and we can leave that to the tech experts.
    I also noticed the company will be cooperating with Rentrak on keeping notice of the sells. This could potentially rises some ethical issues that should be considered.
    But otherwise, this is a good idea and has tons of potential.

    ReplyDelete